PINKERTON FREE DUE TO PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT

KRSTAFER W PINKERTON
v.
COUNTY OF KAUAI, KAUAI PROSECUTORS OFFICE, MARC E. GUYOT

CASE 08-00222-HG-KSC
FILED 05-15-08 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE STATE OF HAWAII

October 2007: Krstafer Pinkerton, a computer and network analyst and resident of Koloa with a Web site and blogs that critique the Kauai police department, prosecutor’s office and the county’s legal processes, was declared a free man due to prosecutorial misconduct.

     "Given the circumstances which contributed to the delay by the prosecutor's office — the delay in submitting the order for court but moreso the delays caused by interference of a court order — the court's granting the dismissal with prejudice, Mr. Pinkerton, you are hereby discharged, these charges cannot be brought against you again" said Circuit Court Judge Kathleen N.A. Watanabe


 

 

 

A Plethora of Prosecutorial Abuses Throughout 
2006 & 2007

 

Closing Arguments:
10/09/07

 

 

 

Reconsideration Hearing
11/06/07


 

 

Pinkerton Walks Over Rule 48
Written by Amanda C. Gregg - THE GARDEN ISLAND
Emphasis contributed by Krstafer Pinkerton


A man who is perhaps best known as a gadfly among county officials won his case yesterday, because Kauai prosecutors interfered with a court order.

Krstafer Pinkerton, a computer and network analyst and resident of Koloa with a Web site and blogs that critique the Kauai police department, prosecutor’s office and the county’s legal processes, was declared a free man yesterday. 

 Circuit Court Judge Kathleen Watanabe found Pinkerton had been denied his right under Rule 48 to have a trial within six months due to a prosecutor interfering with a court order. 

Due to Prosecutorial Misconduct, all charges, which include 2 counts of assault on two police officers, DUI, criminal property damage, open container violation, and resisting arrest, have all been dropped "With Prejudice". 

According to court records, the County of Kauai Prosecutors had charged Pinkerton with enough crimes to put Pinkerton in prison for nearly 25 years.   

A district court case against Pinkerton was also dropped “With Prejudice” in August by District Court Judge Trudy Senda based on the same infraction. The charges he was arrested on for the District Court case was Terroristic Threatening in the first degree and Intimidating a Witness, the alleged victim was also a Kauai Police Officer. Those charges were later dropped to a harassment charge despite Pinkerton’s plea for a jury trial. According to state law, there is no jury trial for harassment charges.

 Dan Hempey, Pinkerton’s attorney, said in court that his client had suffered more than a violation of Rule 48 but had also been denied several civil rights.  

According to court documents, a letter from the Prosecuting Attorney’s Office dated May 23, 2006 offered Pinkerton two days to accept a plea deal to cover a total of 3 separate arrests,  4 felonies and 5 misdemeanors, dismissed without prejudice.  

The deal was based on several conditions, including his waiving of the right to Rule 48,  to withdrawing civil claims against the County of Kauai, to sign releases of liability for any and all of it's various departments , to take down his Web site kpinkerton.com, to disclose how he obtained the screen captures from the police records management system that he is displaying on his website, to write letters of apology to the police officers in question and agree to moving away from Kaua‘i within 60 days of May 23, 2006.  Pinkerton said "no". 

According to Pinkerton’s website, Pinkerton claims of police conspiring against him for his discussions with former Kauai Chief K.C. Lum to purchase and planning the installation of GPS modules in police cruisers.   

Through an alleged malicious pattern of practice by Kauai Police Officers, Pinkerton had been arrested twice before on other interesting charges, Pinkerton also claims that his audio recorder and GPS antennae were stolen when he was beaten up by police “who had no probable cause” to approach him when he was charged for 2 counts of Assault on Police officers, Resisting Arrest, Criminal Property Damage, DUI, Illegal Storage of and Intoxicant. 

“This case started with an arrest, then went to (Pinkerton’s previous attorney), then to a plea offer to dismiss the case entirely if he would take down his Web site and move,” Hempey said.  

“He says ‘No’ and wants his right to a trial, and he gets indicted again — and the state makes the mistake of thinking the indictment clock starts over. But it doesn’t,” Hempey said.  

Though both the prosecution and defense agreed 148 days of the 180-day limit had been clocked when tallying Rule 48, 35 remaining days remained for Watanabe to divvy out.  

At the crux of the issue was the timeline of a motion filed by Deputy Prosecuting Attorney Marc Guyot and granted by Watanabe Nov. 20, 2006, requesting a mental and penal responsibility examination of Pinkerton.  Watanabe had granted the motion with a two-week deadline.   

Court records show the order was filed Dec. 14, meaning prosecutors didn’t meet that deadline, Hempey said. Even if they had, he argued, only half of the order had been set in motion.  

That’s because prosecutors had “unilaterally told (the doctor) to only do the mental portion of the examination and not do the penal responsibility section,” Hempey said, deducing that a delay of Rule 48 happened “because of Marc Guyot’s’ prosecutorial usurpation of the court’s authority.”  

“That delay was caused by the prosecutor telling the doctor to ignore half a court order.  I can’t think of anything more egregious in terms of delaying a case than (Prosecutor Marc Guyot) going behind a court order and telling someone not to follow it. That caused the delay. The 704 proceedings did not cause the delay”, Hempey said.

But prosecutors maintained their office had filed the order prior to Dec. 14, despite the absence of a record.  

Though there weren’t minutes or court records to that effect, First Deputy Prosecutor Christopher Bridges said Guyot had written a note in his file stating he had processed the order before Dec. 14 and that it had been rejected and he was forced to resubmit it on the latter date.  

But Hempey said a note written in a prosecutor’s file shouldn’t be considered an official record.  

“I don’t want to be glib,” Hempey said. “But I don’t think a note from Mr. Guyot in the file relayed to the court by Mr. Bridges satisfies their burden of proof. This is the problem with recharging a guy in the middle of the time clock.”  

Watanabe said after investigating on her end, the order had been expeditiously executed.  

“This court takes great pride in moving orders out of its chambers,” Watanabe said. “If this court were responsible for what basically attributed to the delay of Mr. Pinkerton I’d be the first to admit it,” she said. “In a matter of 24 hours the order was turned around by this court.”  

With all those factors in mind, Watanabe said Pinkerton’s case had used up 198 days, thus precluding him from being within the allotted amount of time to proceed to trial.  

According to court records, the original date of arrest was March 5, 2006 and calculating the time from arrest to the time of this hearing has been 583 days or 1 year, 7 months, 4 days.   

583 days can be converted to one of these units: 50,371,200 seconds or 839,520 minutes or 13,992 hours.  

  “Given the circumstances which contributed to the delay by the prosecutor’s office — the delay in submitting the order for court but moreso the delays caused by  interference of a court order — the court’s granting the dismissal with prejudice, Mr. Pinkerton, you are hereby discharged, these charges cannot be brought against you again"  Watanabe said.

 

[emphasis added by PINKERTON]

Original Text Void of Emphasis:
http://www.kauaiworld.com/articles/2007/10/10/news/news03.txt


Krstafer Pinkerton
P.O. Box 1643
Koloa, Hi  96756

808 557 6570

PINKERTON@kpinkerton.com


 

08-00222