|
Against these
Defendants:
First Deputy
Prosecutor Marc E. Guyot
from March 23, 3005 to
February, 20087: Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments malicious
prosecution, Title 18, U.S.C., § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under
Color of Law, TITLE 42 U.S.C., 21 § 1986 Action for neglect to
prevent, Title 42, U.S.C., § 14141 Pattern and Practice, Title
42, U.S.C., § 1985
Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
County of Kauai:
Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments malicious
prosecution, Title 18, U.S.C., § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under
Color of Law, TITLE 42 U.S.C., 21 § 1986 Action for neglect to
prevent, Title 42, U.S.C., § 14141 Pattern and Practice, Title
42, U.S.C., § 1985
Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
County of Kauai
Prosecutors Office:
Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments malicious
prosecution, Title 18, U.S.C., § 242 Deprivation of Rights Under
Color of Law, TITLE 42 U.S.C., 21 § 1986 Action for neglect to
prevent, Title 42, U.S.C., § 14141 Pattern and Practice, Title
42, U.S.C., § 1985
Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Kauai County Police Department:
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1983.
deprivation of rights Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern and Practice,
Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law Title
18, U.S.C., Section 245 Federally Protected Activities
Gilbert V. Asuncion;
October 23, 2005: December 13, 2005 Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1982. Property
rights of citizens, Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1983. deprivation of rights
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern and Practice, Title 42 U.S.C.,
Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law Title 18, U.S.C.,
Section 245 Federally Protected Activities
David Banquel; October
24, 2005: Title 42, U.S.C., Section
1983. deprivation of rights Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern and
Practice, Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil
rights Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of
Law
Sgt. Richard Rosa;
December 13, 2005, December 14, 2005: Title 42, U.S.C., Section 1983.
deprivation of rights Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern and Practice,
Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law Title
18, U.S.C., Section 245 Federally Protected Activities
Sgt. Agni; October 23, 24
2005 and December 13, 2005, December 14, 2005: Title 42, U.S.C., Section
1983. deprivation of rights Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern and
Practice, Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil
rights Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of
Law Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245 Federally Protected Activities
Officer Okamoto;
December 14, 2005: Title 42, U.S.C., Section
1983. deprivation of rights Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern and
Practice, Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil
rights Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of
Law
Officer Nelson Gabriel;
December 14, 2005: Title 42, U.S.C., Section
1983. deprivation of rights Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern and
Practice, Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil
rights Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color of
Law
Officer Steven Vinzant:
March 5 and 6 2006: Title 42, U.S.C.,
Section 1983. deprivation of rights, Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern
and Practice, Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with
civil rights Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color
of Law ,
TITLE 42 U.S.C., 21 § 1986 Action for neglect to prevent, Title 42, U.S.C.,
§ 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
Officer
Phillip Banquel March 5 and 6 2006: Title 42, U.S.C.,
Section 1983. deprivation of rights, Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 Pattern
and Practice, Title 42 U.S.C., Section 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with
civil rights Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242 Deprivation of Rights Under Color
of Law ,
TITLE 42 U.S.C., 21 § 1986 Action for neglect to prevent, Title 42, U.S.C.,
§ 1985 Conspiracy to interfere with civil rights
|
|
WHAT THE LAW SAYS:
It is a crime for one or more persons
acting under color of law willfully to deprive or conspire to
deprive another person of any right protected by the Constitution or
laws of the United States.
"Color of law" simply means that the person
doing the act is using power given to him or her by a governmental
agency (local, state or federal).
Criminal acts under color of law include
acts not only done by local, state, or federal officials within the
bounds or limits of their lawful authority, but also acts done
beyond the bounds of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may
also be covered under color of law, if the perpetrator asserted
their official status in some manner.
Color of law may include public officials
who are not law enforcement officers, for example, judges and
prosecutors, as well as, in some circumstances, non governmental
employees who are asserting state authority, such as private
security guards.
While the federal authority to investigate
color of law type violations extends to any official acting under
"color of law", the vast
majority of the allegations are against the law enforcement
community.
The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution guarantees
the right against unreasonable searches or seizures.
An unlawful detention or an
illegal confiscation of property would be examples of such an abuse
of power.
An official would violate
the color of law statute by fabricating evidence against or
conducting a false arrest of an individual. That person's
rights of due process and unreasonable seizure have been violated.
In the case of deprivation of property, the official would violate
the color of law statute by unlawfully obtaining or maintaining the
property of another. In that case, the official has overstepped or
misapplied his authority.
The Fourteenth Amendment secures the right to due process and the
Eighth Amendment also prohibits the use of cruel and unusual
punishment. In an arrest or detention context, these rights would
prohibit the use of force amounting to punishment (summary
judgment). The idea being that a person accused of a crime is to
be allowed the opportunity to have a trial and not be subjected to
punishment without having been afforded the opportunity of the legal
process.
The public entrusts its law enforcement officials with protecting
the community. If it is shown that an official willfully failed
to keep an individual from harm that official could be in violation
of the color of law statute. |
|
A breakdown of U.S.
Constitutional Rights Violated: |
Amendment I - Freedom
of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly;
Right to Petition for
Redress of Grievances
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition
the Government for a redress of grievances.
|
Amendment IV -
Searches and Seizures; Probable Cause
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses,
papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures,
shall not be violated, and
no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported
by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be
searched, and the persons or things to be seized. |
Amendment V - Grand Jury; Double Jeopardy;
Self
Incrimination; Due Process; Compensation for Private
Property
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise
infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand
Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the
militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor
shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in
jeopardy of life or limb;
nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against
himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due
process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use
without just compensation.
|
Amendment VI -
Speedy, Public Trial by Impartial Jury; Informed of Charge; Confront
Accuser; Favorable Witnesses; Right to Counsel
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a
speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and
district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district
shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of
the nature and cause of the accusation;
to be confronted with the
witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining
witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for
his defense.
|
Amendment VIII -
Excessive Bail and
Fines; Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
|
| TITLE 42 CHAPTER 21
§ 1986
Action for neglect to prevent
Every person who
(Mayor Baptiste and County Attorney Jim
Itamura, Kauai Police Commissioners and many other departments),
having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired
to be done, and mentioned in section 1985 of this title, are about
to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing
the commission of the same, neglects or refuses so to do, if such
wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or
his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful
act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented;
and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any
number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be
joined as defendants in the action
|
TITLE 42
U.S.C.,CHAPTER 21 § 1982
Property rights of citizens
All citizens of the United States shall have the same right, in
every State and Territory, as is enjoyed by white citizens thereof
to inherit, purchase, lease, sell, hold, and convey real and
personal property.
REFUSED TO RENDER AID link
|
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242
Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
This statute makes it a crime for any person acting under color of
law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom to willfully deprive
or cause to be deprived from any person those rights, privileges, or
immunities secured or protected by the Constitution and laws of the
U.S.
This law further prohibits a person acting under color of law,
statute, ordinance, regulation or custom to willfully subject or
cause to be subjected any person to different punishments, pains, or
penalties, than those prescribed for punishment of citizens on
account of such person being an alien or by reason of his/her color
or race.
Acts under "color of any law" include acts not only done by federal,
state, or local officials within the bounds or limits of their
lawful authority, but also acts done without and beyond the bounds
of their lawful authority; provided that, in order for unlawful acts
of any official to be done under "color of any law," the unlawful
acts must be done while such official is purporting or pretending to
act in the performance of his/her official duties. This definition
includes, in addition to law enforcement officials, individuals such
as Mayors, Council persons, Judges, Nursing Home Proprietors,
Security Guards, etc., persons who are bound by laws, statutes
ordinances, or customs.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or
both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use,
attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives,
or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if
death results, or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to
kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this
title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or
may be sentenced to death.
|
Title 18, U.S.C., Section 245
Federally Protected Activities
Assault by Officer Gilbert V. Asuncion at Koloa Elementary
1) This statute prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or
interference, or attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of
any person or class of persons because of their activity as:
a) A voter, or person qualifying to vote...;
b) a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program,
facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States;
c) an applicant for federal employment or an employee by the federal
government;
d) a juror or prospective juror in federal court; and
e) a participant in any program or activity receiving Federal
financial assistance.
2) Prohibits willful injury, intimidation, or interference or
attempt to do so, by force or threat of force of any person because
of race, color, religion, or national origin and because of his/her
activity as:
a) A student or applicant for admission to any public school or
public College;
b) a participant in any benefit, service, privilege, program,
facility, or activity provided or administered by a state or local
government;
c) an applicant for private or state employment, private or state
employee; a member or applicant for membership in any labor
organization or hiring hall; or an applicant for employment through
any employment agency, labor organization or hiring hall;
d) a juror or prospective juror in state court;
e) a traveler or user of any facility of interstate commerce or
common carrier; or
f) a patron of any public accommodation, including hotels, motels,
restaurants, lunchrooms, bars, gas stations, theaters...or any other
establishment which serves the public and which is principally
engaged in selling food or beverages for consumption on the
premises.
3) Prohibits interference by force or threat of force against any
person because he/she is or has been, or in order to intimidate such
person or any other person or class of persons from participating or
affording others the opportunity or protection to so participate, or
lawfully aiding or encouraging other persons to participate in any
of the benefits or activities listed in items (1) and (2), above
without discrimination as to race, color, religion, or national
origin.
Punishment varies from a fine or imprisonment of up to one year, or
both, and if bodily injury results or if such acts include the use,
attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives,
or fire shall be fined or imprisoned up to ten years or both, and if
death results or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to
kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated
sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be subject to
imprisonment for any term of years or for life or may be sentenced
to death
|
Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141
Pattern and Practice
This civil statute was a provision within the Crime Control Act of
1994 and makes it unlawful for any governmental authority, or agent
thereof, or any person acting on behalf of a governmental authority,
to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct by law enforcement
officers or by officials or employees of any governmental agency
with responsibility for the administration of juvenile justice or
the incarceration of juveniles that deprives persons of rights,
privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution
or laws of the United States.
Whenever the Attorney General has reasonable cause to believe that a
violation has occurred, the Attorney General, for or in the name of
the United States, may in a civil action obtain appropriate
equitable and declaratory relief to eliminate the pattern or
practice.
Types of misconduct covered include, among other things:
1. Excessive Force
2. Discriminatory Harassment
3. False Arrest
4. Coercive Sexual Conduct
5. Unlawful Stops, Searches, or Arrests |
Section 1988. Proceedings in vindication
of civil rights
(a) Applicability of statutory and common law
The jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters conferred on the
district courts by the provisions of titles 13, 24, and 70 of the
Revised Statutes for the protection of all persons in the United
States in their civil rights, and for their vindication, shall be
exercised and enforced in conformity with the laws of the United
States, so far as such laws are suitable to carry the same into
effect; but in all cases where they are not adapted to the object,
or are deficient in the provisions necessary to furnish suitable
remedies and punish offenses against law, the common law, as
modified and changed by the constitution and statutes of the State
wherein the court having jurisdiction of such civil or criminal
cause is held, so far as the same is not inconsistent with the
Constitution and laws of the United States, shall be extended to and
govern the said courts in the trial and disposition of the cause,
and, if it is of a criminal nature, in the infliction of punishment
on the party found guilty.
(b) Attorney's fees In any action or proceeding to enforce a
provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of
this title, title IX of Public Law 92-318 (20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.),
the Religious Freedom
Restoration Act of 1993 (42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.), the Religious
Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (42 U.S.C. 2000cc
et seq.), title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. 2000d
et seq.), or section 13981 of this title, the court, in its
discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United
States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs, except
that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an
act or omission taken in such officer's judicial capacity such
officer shall not be held liable for any costs, including attorney's
fees, unless such action was clearly in excess of such officer's
jurisdiction.
(c) Expert fees In awarding an attorney's fee under subsection (b)
of this section in any action or proceeding to enforce a provision
of
section 1981 or 1981a of this title, the court, in its discretion,
may include expert fees as part of the attorney's fee.
|
|
Section 1985. Conspiracy to interfere
with civil rights
(1) Preventing officer from performing duties
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire to
prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from
accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under
the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof; or to
induce by like means any officer of the United States to leave any
State, district, or place, where his duties as an officer are
required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or
property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his
office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to
injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede
him in the discharge of his official duties;
(2) Obstructing
justice; intimidating party, witness, or juror If two or more
persons in any State or Territory conspire to deter, by force,
intimidation, or threat, any party or witness in
any court of the United States from attending such court, or from
testifying to any matter pending therein, freely, fully, and
truthfully, or to injure such party or witness in his person or
property on account of his having so attended or testified, or to
influence the verdict, presentment, or indictment of any grand or
petit juror in any such court, or to injure such juror in his person
or property on account of any verdict, presentment, or indictment
lawfully assented to by him, or of his being or having
been such juror; or if two or more persons conspire for the purpose
of impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner,
the due course of justice in any State or Territory, with intent to
deny to any citizen the equal protection of the laws, or to injure
him or his property for lawfully enforcing, or attempting to
enforce, the right of any person, or class of persons, to the equal
protection of the laws;
(3) Depriving persons of rights or privileges
If two or more persons in any State or Territory conspire or go in
disguise on the highway or on the premises of another, for the
purpose of depriving, either directly or indirectly, any person or
class of persons of the equal protection of the laws, or of equal
privileges and immunities under the laws; or for the purpose of
preventing or hindering the constituted authorities of any State or
Territory from giving or securing to all persons within such State
or Territory the equal protection of the laws; or if two or more
persons conspire to prevent by force, intimidation, or threat, any
citizen who is lawfully entitled to vote, from giving his support
or advocacy in a legal manner, toward or in favor of the election of
any lawfully qualified person as an elector for President or Vice
President, or as a Member of Congress of the United States; or to
injure any citizen in person or property on account of such support
or advocacy; in any case of conspiracy set forth in this section, if
one or more persons engaged therein do, or cause to be done, any act
in furtherance of the object of such conspiracy,
whereby another is injured in his person or property, or deprived of
having and exercising any right or privilege of a citizen of the
United States, the party so injured or deprived may have an action
for the recovery of damages occasioned by such injury or
deprivation, against any one or more of the conspirators. |
| TITLE 42 CHAPTER 21 §
1983
Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation,
custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of
Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the
United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the
deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the
Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an
action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for
redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial
officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial
capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a
declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was
unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress
applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be
considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia.
|
[includes/copyright.htm] |