|
FEDERAL COURT CASE |
The defendants - Kauai police and prosecutors - violated numerous
basic Constitutional Rights. The defendants’ conspired to, among other
things, fabricate criminal charges against Pinkerton for his efforts to
install GPS systems in police cars, threatened to shoot Pinkertons dogs
and breach his private property if he would not leave his private home
to submit to an illegal and warrantless arrest, inflicted a violent
beating on Pinkerton, repeatedly arrest Pinkerton without probable
cause, misused the Judicial and Grand Jury process by arresting and re-arresting
Pinkerton for the exact same alleged crimes from the 3rd arrest on
separate occasions even though Pinkerton had already posted bail for the
initial charges, and continually denied Pinkerton fair trials in criminal
cases by instructing a competency examiner to ignore a court order
informing the doctor to disregard the penal liability portion of the
court ordered mental examination because the order was flawed. My claims against the police and prosecutors seemed too unbelievable and difficult to prove for seasoned civil trial lawyers so it was left to me and my pursuit of Justice to piece it all together & prove my claims against the defendants for their long list of civil rights violations in order to hold them accountable for their crimes. Judge Helen Gilmore told me and the Defendants Attorney David J. Minkin in a phone conference that it is up to me to deliver the facts to the court and that her job is that of an adjudicator of justice, not an investigator. After that, she suggested to Mr. Minkin to file for Summary Judgment. I prayed and cried out for God to help me prove the claims so that what happened to me wont continue to happen to other people by the defendants in this case: l. false
arrest; My prayers were answered the day the Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment was submitted to the court. That day was Friday, March 13, 2009. FRCP 56 told me how to prove there was a malicious conspiracy by named defendants to slander Pinkertons reputation and suppress evidence of police crimes committed against Pinkerton by defendants over and over again. Defendants took constant directive from superiors and county official to interfere and suppress Pinkertons rights from gaining access to a fair trial to present evidence to the court of the police crimes committed against him or to face his accusers, all defendant police officers. To prove the claims set forth in my Amended Complaint, my Separate and Concise Statements of Facts and Affidavit of Krstafer W. Pinkerton, 40 EXHIBITS, and Opposition to Defendants Motion provides all the missing elements left out in my Original and Amended Complaints. |
|
|
<-----Looking for the old KPINKERTON.COM website? It is right here----->