PINKERTON VS. COUNTY OF KAUAI, KAUAI PROSECUTORS OFFICE AND MARC E.
GUYOT
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Asuncion statement
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Evidence:
James Alfini, First Amendment expert and dean
of the South Texas College of Law said regarding the PINKERTON PLEA OFFER: Download the PLEA OFFER HERE [PDF]
I have had to opportunity to have received the following documents:
Chronological order of events:
Was probable cause established? NO Was due process executed? NO In the image below, notice the “created by” and “date created” fields are
in reversed chronological order. The most current entry is at the top.
Below is Drapesa report which was inputted after Asuncion but before
Banquel. How can the mix-up occur? Drapesa K01067 took my statement at KPD headquarters on Tuesday, October 25, 2005. Drapesa says Banquel never took a statement. Drapesa says Banquel advised me of my rights which is not accurate. How would he know if I had or had not been read my rights?
Second Arrest:
SCREEN CAPTURE OF RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROVE ARRESTING OFFICERS
NEVER FILED POLICE REPORTS
Asuncion says he is a victim and wants to stay out of what has happened,
then why does his overtime report show he is assisting in my arrest?
Note below Asuncion states his reasons for overtime are for him doing an INVESTIGATION. Would you agree that he was conducting an investigation or he was stalking me, conspiring with other officers to come arrest me without DUE PROCESS, without an arrest warrant. Was there ever an arrest warrant? No. As noted in the RMS image above, the "narrative type" code Asuncion is "F" for follow up. The "investigator" is marked with an "I". How can Asuncion be both victim and investigator? December 13, 2005 In retaliation to the complaints I have filed against Officer Gilbert Asuncion, the same officer swears at Pinkerton and sticks his finger to Pinkertons chest. Mr. Pinkerton is later arrested for Terroristic Threatening and Intimidating a Witness, the next morning at 02:30am at Pinkertons residence by three Kauai Police officers who did not have an arrest warrant and did not file police reports as shown in the screen capture. The State pursues a charge of harassment despite not having an arrest warrant, despite listening to the audio files of the arresting officers the morning of Dec 14, 2005 at 02:30am, all to keep the evidence out of the hands of a jury. There is no JURY TRIAL for a petty misdemeanor. Once again, Officer Asuncions audio file which he is heard saying that he is a victim and he wants to stay out of it. This shows pattern of practice. The scanned hospital documents below depict the injuries that were sustained on March 5, 2006 at the hands of three Kauai Police Officers. This would be the third (and hopefully last) arrest. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home
Contact Me
|